Consequences of delaying early intervention in Oral Cancer
Mr.HN walked into a restaurant for his wife’s birthday luncheon. He ordered her favorite meal, sipped some ice tea on a hot afternoon and took her for a long drive humming her favorite song and cracking up once in a while with silly jokes. One may wonder, what is so extraordinary about this? Simple acts of being able to chew, swallow, sip some tea, singing or conversing with our loved ones, are taken for granted by many of us. But for Mr. HN this was a blessing and he was glad he could lead a normal life. For just a year and a half ago, he had endured a surgery that resulted in the removal of a small portion of his tongue after being diagnosed with oral cancer. He is thankful he hasn’t lost it all. Thanks to his wife who had coaxed him to seek early help. Things could have been different for this middle-aged gentleman if he had delayed intervention for his oral cancer. Not only would the cost of treating advanced-stage oral cancer be heavy on his pockets. He would have risked living with severe morbidity, a possible disfigurement, poor outcome and prognosis.
Oral Cancer is defined as malignancy involving mouth, palate, gingiva, cheeks, lips and tongue and is among the top three cancers in India. The major risk factor for oral cancer includes severe alcohol usage, tobacco chewing or in the form of smoke (cigarettes), Human papilloma virus (HPV). The common type of oral cancer includes tongue cancer and the common site is the buccal mucosa and gingiva. The incidence of oral cancer in people who smoke or chew tobacco is 8.5 times more than those who do not have this habit. In spite of widespread awareness campaigns and statutory warnings, it has been observed that about 57% of men and about 11% women between the ages of 15 to 49 years of age, use some or the other form of tobacco. Sadly tobacco constitutes to about 90% of oral cancer cases. Therefore it will not be a false claim to say that oral cancer can be easily prevented if such lifestyle choices or habits are controlled.
Benefits to early diagnosis & intervention:
Detection of oral cancer at an early stage is the most effective means to improve survival, reduced morbidity and disfigurement. More than half of oral cancer patients are diagnosed when presented with advanced lesions. Many are unaware that early diagnosis is key to improved survival, reduced morbidity, disfigurement, duration of hospital stay as well as the over-all cost of treatment.
Barriers to seeking help at the right time:
A complex matrix of factors could influence patient delay in seeking help at the right time. The ability to recognize and interpret the symptoms seems to be a primary factor. The inability to attribute the symptoms to cancer could possibly result in delay seeking help. One study calculated that the mis-attribution of symptoms accounted for about 60% of the total time to diagnose. Patients often ignore symptoms and do not seek action, till a critical event has occurred or has begun to affect their day to day life. There is also a larger belief in the general population that one should try to cope with symptoms themselves, prior to seeking help. The time taken for self-care of symptoms acts as one of the major barriers in seeking help and time lost in early intervention. Though it may seem irrational, trivial reasons and patient’s perceived problems such as distance needed to travel to a doctor, the cost of consultation etc are also some of the factors influencing the delay in seeking help. For some, other life circumstances or priorities such as childcare, work commitments, existing comorbidity etc may seem more important than their oral symptoms. A UK study observed that about 30% of patients delay seeking help for more than 3 months following the self-discovery of symptoms of oral cancer. It is likely that this percentage could be higher for India, the main barriers to delay being the understanding of symptoms.
Eventually triggers such as coaxing from a friend or family, change in symptoms or worsening of symptoms, persistent symptoms, the need to relieve pain or discomfort, need to resolve uncertainty, interference of symptoms in their daily life, unpleasant symptoms etc, helps a patient to seek help for diagnosis and intervention.
Sometimes the delay in diagnosis can also be attributed to the clinician and includes factors such as low familiarity with the disease, greater attention to existing comorbidity than investigating the nature of lesion or attribute it to cancer, lack of oral cancer knowledge that delays timely referrals and thereby treatment.
Therefore, diagnostic and intervention delay is dependent on various factors such as tumor biology, patient awareness/proactivity, clinician awareness, early referrals etc.
Consequence of delay in seeking intervention:
When early diagnosis or intervention is delayed, oral cancer is likely to progress. Oral cancer treatment in advanced stages is a challenge in many aspects. It involves a complex surgical procedure not only involving excision of the tumor, but also reconstruction. Advanced stage oral cancer also affects survival and quality of life. Diagnosis of larger oral carcinoma is associated with a higher risk of nodal metastasis and poor survival.
Oral cancer continues to be a major public health concern. The incidence has slowly increased over the years in both sexes. Early detection and prevention are pivotal to decrease this disease burden in India. If patients are well aware of the risks of oral cancer, and are educated about self-examination of the oral cavity and maintaining oral hygiene, chances are that many lesions may possibly be detected in pre-cancerous stage and treated as necessary. Although there are no standard guidelines or tests available globally for oral cancer screening, based on the high incidence of this disease and population of India, it is considered a best practice to go for an annual oral screening to a dentist or a physician if one is a high-risk individual (those with long term use of alcohol, practice of chewing betel quid, tobacco, gutka, etc). Early detection of oral cancer has a better prognosis as well as a reduced cost of treatment when compared to advanced-stage cancer. Although primary prevention through mass screening has challenges, secondary prevention that involves early detection of invasive carcinoma and precursor lesions is possible if a patient seeks helps at the right time. Today, advancements in various techniques, imaging and use of molecular markers have resulted in precision diagnosis and staging. It is needless to say that the presence of facilities such as advanced imaging, experience tumor-site specific oncologist with clinical experience in treating oral cancers and accurate staging can play a role in the improved outcome, long term survival and quality of life. Interventions aimed at reducing patient delay require a concerted effort to understand the influences of help-seeking behavior. Patients do not have to live in fear of possible disfigurement or the possibility of losing social life. Advancements in reconstructive surgery and minimally invasive surgery have made significant progress in the area of how cancer surgeries of head and neck are performed. Many patients with advanced cancer are now able to go back to leading a normal social life through oral reconstructive surgery and rehabilitation.